Written by Frances Galleymore. Tx 1st April 1985
Possibly inspired by Mr Baxter’s previous complaints that the others keep on finishing off the coffee without replacing it, the staff room is now the proud recipient of an imposing new vending machine. Mr Smart and Miss Washington aren’t impressed though, she comments that it just makes a terrible groaning noise and doesn’t deliver, leading him to respond that it sounds like the school in general. Mrs McClusky, of course, just happens to wander into the staff room at that precise moment ….
Caroline Gruber has another opportunity to demonstrate Miss Washington’s doe-eyed appeal after Mrs McClusky expresses her opinion that some of the first years (especially the ones in Miss Washington’s charge) are pushing the school uniform rules to the limit. It’s plain that Mrs McClusky believes that the younger teacher isn’t setting them a good example, but politeness – and Mrs McClusky is sweetness personified during this scene – dictates that she doesn’t openly come out and say so.
There’s some later nice staff-room interplay (Mr Bronson complaining about the level of smoke and continuing to bemoan the fact that others have taken his seat) but the episode revolves around two main areas – Eric’s accident and the babysitting misadventures at the McCartneys.
Those with fairly long memories might recall that Eric, previously revealed to be partially deaf, featured in an earlier series eight episode. The poor boy is now the recipient of Janet’s interest (who seems to have finally decided that Roland – constantly speaking French – is now totally absorbed with Fabienne) but she wasn’t there at the moment when Eric stepped out into the road and was knocked over.
I’m not sure whether Eric’s deafness is supposed to be a factor here – but this doesn’t make much sense if so, surely he’d have looked left and right to check the road was clear before crossing? Possibly he was simply chosen because whilst not a main cast member (whose absence would be problematic) he was still someone with a higher profile than a non-speaking extra – and therefore his accident would carry a little more impact.
If that was the case, they could have used Diane. Although she has a couple of lines in this episode, they only highlight just how underused she’s been throughout series eight (whereas during 83/84 she’d featured quite prominently). It seemed that once her spots faded away so did any thoughts about developing her character, so she’ll not return in 1986.
One point of interest is the way that Mrs McClusky appears on the scene mere seconds after the accident. How did she get from the school to the road outside so quickly? Was she waiting in the playground for such an accident to happen?!
Real-life school politics of the mid eighties do get a brief mention when the fourth-formers are left to their own devices, thanks to a cover strike. British schools were hit by waves of industrial action during this period, as teachers regularly worked to rule and refused to cover their colleague’s lessons. Phil Redmond would have no doubt made capital out of this, but here it’s very much an incidental point – at this point in the show’s history, staff-room squabbles are more over coffee and chairs than politics ….
There’s an air of deceit running through this episode. Fay agrees to babysit for Mr and Mrs McCartney and Julian offers to walk her home. Fay, still not keen on the worthy-but-dull Julian, tells him that the babysitting’s been cancelled, so that Jean-Paul can go instead. And with Annette and Stewpot also there, everything’s set for a cosy evening. Which of course doesn’t go to plan.
If Fay lies to Julian, then Stewpot continues to lie to Annette. Just as Claire’s been somewhat reduced in character during series eight, then poor Stewpot has also received the rough end of the scripting stick. By continually stringing both Claire and Annette along – lacking the courage to choose between them – he’s portrayed as buffoonish at best and an insensitive idiot at worst. Even here, he can’t bring himself to tell Annette that it’s over, but since he’s clearly not enjoying himself, why not?
Jean-Paul burns a hole in the McCartney’s carpet with his cigarette, providing us with yet another example of his flawed character. His plan – chuck a scatter cushion over the offending mark and walk slowly away – also highlights that he never stops to think about the consequences of his actions. This moment was no doubt one of several created in order to prepare the ground for episode fourteen.
One frustrating thing about this series is its heavy over-reliance on boyfriend-girlfriend plots, a part of teenage life that often seemed to be passed over in previous years. Having not one but three ‘eternal triangle’ storylines (Stewpot, Fay and Jackie) running concurrently is a bit repetitive, and dilutes their distinctiveness. I wonder what the intention was. To create intertwining plots that reflected each other in dramatically interesting ways? Or to make a change of emphasis very apparent?
And that French exchange has been going on for a long time. When I was on a French exchange in the 80s, we only spent a fortnight abroad.
LikeLike
Yes, three love triangles is overkill, especially when it becomes their defining character trait (especially noticeable with both Stewpot and Claire who are rather reduced to annoying ciphers with seemingly no other interests outside Stewpot’s infidelity).
It also can’t be coincidental that several characters find themselves acting out a fictionalised version of themselves in the school play – there’s some sort of satiric point being made here, but it’s not really developed.
Jackie can discuss, during the confines of the play, how she dislikes having two boys fighting for her affections and it obviously parallels real life. But since she could have easily have had that conversation with Zammo and Banksie anyway it doesn’t have a great deal of impact.
If the confines of the play had been the only place they could have expressed their real feelings for each other, this part of the storyline might have carried a little more weight.
LikeLike
Hi, been reading your episode reviews since I started a rewatch of GH a couple of months back, been enjoying them.
Just thought I’d jump in here seeing as you mention Diane being dropped from storylines this series. I noticed they seem to have dropped Lisa York too, she barely appears and has had about 2 lines so far which is a shame as she was always one of my favourite characters. I watched these back in the 80’s, I was around the same age as what Zammo and Jackie would have been then, and my memory must have faded because I always thought Lisa York had a more prominent role, I remember her being a main feature of the Just Say No video for example. Maybe she gets more to do in series 9?
It’s a shame some characters are disappearing into the background, but Roland and Fabienne’s romance is TV gold. I love him in a beret!
Thanks for the reviews,
Steve
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lisa York (Julie) seems to become more of a prominent character in Series 9 and then come Series 10, she and Banksy are probably the only members of the sixth form who get any decent plots to work with.
There was a big ‘cull’ of the fourth year cast at the end of Series 8 – Diane Cooney, Mandy Firth, Sarah Wilks, Jimmy Flynn, Julian Fairbrother, Eric, Loop and of course Annette Firman.
I am assuming in-coming producer Ronald Smedley wanted a shake up of the cast and the axe of so many characters was perhaps necessary to pave the way for the new faces in Series 9.
It was interesting why Julie was retained in Series 9 and not Annette. Annette’s departure was interesting – maybe they couldn’t have done the Fay/Mr King story if Annette had still been around. This story would also have been problematic if Julian had still been on the scene.
LikeLike