Grange Hill – Series Ten, Episode Ten

grange hill s10e10-1

Written by Margaret Simpson.  Tx 6th February 1987

Gonch is back and bearing gifts.  They’re mostly for Ronnie – earrings, a scarf and first of all a bunch of flowers.

Mr Glover pops up for the first time this year.  He’s his usual charmless self and today is baffled as to why everybody’s raising money for Danny.  As one of the more anti-social members of the school community he wonders why anyone would waste their time on him (he doesn’t quite come out and say it wouldn’t matter if he lived or died, but that seems to be his general drift).

Besides, he believes all these extra-curricular activities are getting in the way of Grange Hill providing their pupils with a decent education.  This is a not unreasonable point (in this episode Freddie seems to live in the radio room, so quite how he’s managing to do his schoolwork is a mystery) but Mr Glover doesn’t seem to comprehend that the school should also operate as a community. When it does, then it can teach important life sessons.

As a businessman he seems to embrace the Thatcherite ideal that there’s no such thing as society.  Everybody should look out for themselves and the weak are presumably left to perish.  No wonder that Julia rolls her eyes rather delightfully at this latest diatribe.

Gonch isn’t the only returnee as Laura’s back after a long absence.  Although Gonch’s absence was scripted – Laura’s presumably just been hanging around the school always just out of shot.

As a recovering addict, it’s possibly not surprising that Zammo’s become a master of manipulation.  He wants Jackie to come with him to a Narcotics Anonymous meeting during half term.  This means she would miss the canal trip – but this is all the better in Zammo’s eyes, as he doesn’t like the thought of her and Banksie being stuck together for a week on the same barge.  So is Zammo being sincere when he tells her that he needs her moral support during this difficult period or does he simply not want to risk that she might restart her relationship with Banksie?  If it’s the latter then he’s clearly not a trusting person ….

It was already hinted at last time, but Gonch’s return has something of a destabilising effect.  Hollo finds himself a little sidelined as Gonch is now spending more time with Ronnie than he is with him.  Vince is put out that Hollo shares the secret of their underground secret den (he might want to bring Ronnie – a girl! – back there) whilst even Calley exchanges a brief look with Hollo that suggests she’s not terribly happy with the current situation either.  Although to be fair to Calley she’s much more understanding than Hollo is.

Banksie attempts once more to win Jackie back, but with the same lack of success.  And his face falls even further when she tells him that she’s not going on the canal trip after all (Gonch will be taking his place) as instead she’ll be accompanying Zammo to Narcotics Anonymous.  Poor Banksie, his plaintive cry of “oh why don’t you like me?” after Jackie leaves the common room would surely melt even the hardest of hearts.

Donkey watch.  A Harriet free episode, hurrah!

And so we bid farewell to Imelda.  After her violent antics in the previous episode she leaves in a much more low-key way.  After yet another classroom disagreement she sinks to the floor and refuses to move.  So the passing Mr Mackenzie clears the room and tells her that he can wait there all day until she decides to get up by herself.  Mrs McClusky decides expulsion is the only answer and asks Mr Glover, who’s popped by to harangue her about various matters, to sanction it.  The way his eyes light up make it clear this is something he’s more than happy to do!

We meet Mrs Davis (Marcia King) for the first and last time.  Although it’s recently been revealed that Imelda meets with an educational psychologist we’ve not (unlike Roland) been privy to any of those meetings.  Therefore Imelda’s always remained an unfathomable character.

Will Mrs Davis provide any pointers as to why her daughter is the way she is?  Well Mrs Davis is a little brassy and, to begin with, unconcerned.  She knows that her daughter is (at best) naughty but presumably considers that it’s the school’s problem, not hers.  Only when Mrs McClusky tells her that Imelda will have to leave and possibly attend a special unit (for children like Imelda “who are a little disturbed and have difficulty fitting in”) does she react.  Mrs Davis curls her lip at this.  “You teachers. The labels you put on people”.

Mr Kennedy wishes Imelda all the best as she leaves, but characteristically she doesn’t respond. Therefore she remains an enigma right until the end.

grange hill s10e10-2

4 thoughts on “Grange Hill – Series Ten, Episode Ten

  1. I did raise a cheer (for dramatic rather than ideological reasons) when Mr Glover says, “It’s not what school’s about, Julia. This is what worries me about Grange Hill. There’s all these extracurricular things going on (…) Its all at the expense of what you’re supposed to be at school for.” – i.e. more lessons, bullying, pupils with terrible home lives, etc and far fewer donkeys and radio stations.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Imelda Davis was welcome addition to GH as the latest bad ‘un. Unlike Gripper Stebson, who was evil, cunning and sinister, Imelda was more of a mentally disturbed character who did bad things and was quite volatile with just about everyone she crossed.

    Fluer Taylor was interviewed online by Grange Hill Gold about three years ago – she stated Imelda Davis was only supposed to last for one series, but she agreed to return for the first half of Series 10 to allow the character’s story to come to a natural conclusion.

    It is a nice ‘low key’ departure in comparison to Gripper’s expulsion in Series 6. The way Mr Kennedy says ‘good luck’ to Imelda as she goes off into an unknown and uncertain future is a great scene.

    Actors John Holmes (Gonch) and Fiona Lee Fraser (Laura) were absent for the first few of months of filming in 1986 to focus on their O level exams, so this is why they were absent until episode ten.


  3. Whilst I remember Gripper better, rewatching I think Imelda is a more interesting character. Gripper, is really just a nasty racist and quiet stupid thug, whilst with Imelda there’s a hint of something else.

    There’s a suggestion in this episode of an unhappy home life and several times you see her working quietly away (outside the office in last episode, for example) which suggests she quiet bright and I do wonder if she’s really someone with a very high-intelligence who struggles to fit in and gets easily bored. It’s a shame that she wasn’t around longer, as it would have been nice to see a redemptive arc where someone recognises who she is and her problems and by getting the help she needs she becomes a nicer person (in my imagination this is what happens next to her)


    • Yeah there’s quite a belated attempt to show why she’s gone that way. Had they delved into it more they could have given the audience something to think about – a victim of circumstances or just a nasty piece of work hiding behind them?


Leave a Reply to Nick Allan Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s